The Ultimate Guide to EHS Compliance in Singapore: Navigating Key NEA & MOM Regulations for Your Business

Introduction: The Imperative of EHS Compliance in Singapore’s Business Landscape

 

Setting the Scene: Why EHS is a Board-Level Concern in Modern Singapore

 

In the dynamic and highly regulated business environment of Singapore, Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) has evolved far beyond a mere operational checklist. It now stands as a central pillar of corporate governance, strategic planning, and long-term business resilience. 

The nation’s unwavering commitment to building a sustainable, resource-efficient, and climate-resilient future, coupled with a deep-seated policy of protecting its workforce, has given rise to a stringent and rigorously enforced regulatory framework.1 

For any business operating on the island, from a burgeoning small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) to a multinational corporation, understanding and mastering EHS compliance is not optional—it is fundamental to its license to operate.

A robust EHS management system is inextricably linked to tangible business outcomes. It directly impacts brand reputation, investor confidence, and the ability to secure public and private sector contracts. 

In an era where corporate social responsibility is a key differentiator, a strong EHS record signals a well-managed, ethical, and forward-thinking organization.1 

Conversely, non-compliance can lead to devastating consequences, including crippling fines, stop-work orders, imprisonment for company leadership, and irreparable damage to public image. Therefore, EHS is no longer a conversation confined to the factory floor; it is a critical agenda item in the boardroom.

 

Introducing the Regulators: The Distinct but Converging Roles of MOM and NEA

 

Navigating Singapore’s EHS landscape requires a clear understanding of the two primary regulatory bodies and their distinct mandates:

1. The Ministry of Manpower (MOM): As the guardian of Singapore’s workforce, MOM is primarily concerned with Workplace Safety and Health (WSH). Its mission is to ensure the safety, health, and welfare of every person at work. MOM administers the foundational Workplace Safety and Health Act and its extensive subsidiary legislation, focusing on preventing work-related injuries and illnesses within the workplace. Its approach is characterized by a strong emphasis on risk management, stakeholder responsibility, and severe penalties for lapses.4
2. The National Environment Agency (NEA): As the lead public organization responsible for ensuring a clean and sustainable environment, the NEA’s purview covers the impact of business operations on the environment. It administers the Environmental Protection and Management Act and the Resource Sustainability Act, regulating critical areas such as air and water pollution, noise control, hazardous substance management, and waste reduction. The NEA’s regulations are designed to protect public health and conserve Singapore’s precious natural resources.1

While their domains are distinct—one inward-facing (worker safety) and one outward-facing (environmental protection)—their objectives converge on the principle of responsible business conduct. An effective EHS strategy must holistically address the requirements of both regulators.

 

The Three Pillars of Singapore’s EHS Legislation: An Overview of the WSH Act, EPMA, and RSA

 

The EHS obligations for Singaporean businesses are built upon three foundational legislative pillars. A comprehensive understanding of these Acts is the first step toward achieving compliance.

• The Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Act: This is the primary legislation governing the safety and health of individuals within the workplace. Replacing the outdated Factories Act in 2006, it introduced a modern, risk-based framework that places duties on all stakeholders, from company directors to individual employees, to proactively manage safety and health risks.4
• The Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA): This is the cornerstone of Singapore’s environmental law. It provides the NEA with the authority to control pollution from industrial and commercial activities, covering air emissions, water effluent, noise levels, and the comprehensive management of toxic and hazardous substances.8
• The Resource Sustainability Act (RSA): Enacted to advance Singapore’s Zero Waste Masterplan, this forward-looking legislation addresses the entire lifecycle of products. It introduces an “Extended Producer Responsibility” (EPR) framework, making manufacturers and importers accountable for the end-of-life collection and treatment of their products, with an initial focus on e-waste, food waste, and packaging waste.11

This guide will provide an exhaustive, expert-level analysis of these three pillars and their key subsidiary regulations, offering businesses a clear roadmap to navigate their legal obligations and build a culture of EHS excellence.

 

Part 1: Mastering Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) – Your Obligations to MOM

 

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) enforces a comprehensive and stringent framework designed to cultivate a pervasive safety culture in all workplaces. 

At its core is the Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Act, a transformative piece of legislation that every business leader in Singapore must understand in depth.

 

Deep Dive: The Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Act

 

Core Principles: From Prescriptive Rules to Proactive Risk Ownership

 

The enactment of the WSH Act on March 1, 2006, marked a fundamental paradigm shift in Singapore’s approach to occupational safety. It replaced the prescriptive, rule-based Factories Act with a modern, risk-based framework that emphasizes outcomes over processes.14 

The old model focused heavily on specifying what equipment to use or what procedures to follow in designated “factories.” The WSH Act, by contrast, applies to nearly all workplaces and is built on the philosophy that those who create risks are best placed to manage and control them.7

This new framework is guided by three core principles that define its purpose and enforcement:

1. Reducing Risk at the Source: The Act requires all stakeholders to proactively identify, assess, and then eliminate or minimize the risks they create. This principle moves the focus from reacting to accidents to preventing them before they happen.7
2. Instilling Greater Industry Ownership: Rather than relying on government inspectors to police every workplace, the Act places the primary responsibility for achieving safety and health outcomes squarely on the shoulders of the industry. It empowers and obligates companies to develop and implement safety management systems tailored to their specific operational contexts.7
3. Preventing Accidents through Higher Penalties: The Act introduces significantly higher penalties for non-compliance and high-risk behaviors. This serves as a powerful deterrent, making it clear that compromising on safety has severe financial and legal consequences.7

 

Defining Stakeholder Responsibilities: A Breakdown for Every Level of Your Organisation

 

A key feature of the WSH Act is its distribution of legal duties across a wide range of stakeholders. This “shared responsibility” model ensures that safety is not siloed within a single department but is the duty of everyone involved in the work process. The failure of any single stakeholder to fulfill their duties can lead to prosecution.3

• Employers and Principals: These parties bear the primary duty of care. They must take all reasonably practicable measures to ensure the safety and health of their employees and any contractors they engage. This includes providing and maintaining a safe work environment, implementing safe work procedures, ensuring machinery and equipment are safe, providing adequate instruction and training, and conducting comprehensive risk assessments.3
• Occupiers: An occupier of a workplace (e.g., a building owner or landlord) has a duty to ensure that the premises, including common areas and means of access and egress, are safe and without risk to every person within those premises, whether they are employees or not.7
• Employees: Safety is also a personal responsibility. Employees are legally obligated to follow all established safety and health procedures, use personal protective equipment (PPE) as required, and cooperate with their employer on WSH matters. Crucially, they must take reasonable care of their own safety and that of others who may be affected by their actions.3
• Manufacturers and Suppliers: Those who manufacture, import, or supply any machinery, equipment, or hazardous substance for use at work have a duty to ensure it is designed and constructed to be safe when properly used. They must also provide sufficient information on its safe use, maintenance, and any associated risks.7
• Company Directors and Corporate Officers: The WSH Act extends accountability to the highest levels of corporate leadership. The persistent occurrence of preventable accidents, particularly in high-risk sectors, prompted regulators to look beyond the immediate worksite and examine the role of corporate governance in fostering a safety culture. This led to a clear and deliberate strategy by MOM to hold senior leadership directly answerable for systemic safety failures.

This upward shift in accountability is one of the most significant developments in WSH enforcement. It began with measures like the “Heightened Safety Period” (HSP), which required Chief Executives to personally account to MOM for serious lapses.18 This was formalized through the mandatory

Top Executive WSH Programme, which CEOs and Board Directors of companies in higher-risk industries (construction, manufacturing, transport & storage, and marine) must attend.18

The legal basis for this is Section 48(1) of the WSH Act, which states that where a company commits an offence, its officers (including directors and CEOs) are also deemed guilty unless they can prove the offence was committed without their consent or connivance and that they exercised all due diligence to prevent it.19 To provide clarity on what “due diligence” entails, the

Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) on Chief Executives’ and Board of Directors’ WSH Duties was introduced. This ACOP serves as a legal yardstick in court, outlining the expected behaviors and systems that leaders should implement.20 

The prosecution of company leaders, such as the 2021 conviction of the CEO of Leeden National Oxygen Ltd who was fined $45,000 under this provision, serves as a stark precedent: WSH performance is now inextricably linked to the personal legal liability of those in the C-suite.20

 

Stakeholder	Key Responsibilities	Guiding Principle/Reference
Employer/Principal	– Conduct comprehensive risk assessments for all work activities. – Implement and enforce safe work procedures. – Provide a safe working environment, machinery, and equipment. – Ensure adequate safety training, instruction, and supervision.	Duty to take reasonably practicable measures to ensure the safety and health of workers and others affected by work. 3
Employee	– Follow established safe work procedures and safety rules. – Use personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly. – Report any unsafe conditions or incidents to a supervisor. – Do not engage in any act that would endanger oneself or others.	Duty to take reasonable care for one’s own safety and the safety of others. 3
Occupier	– Ensure the workplace premises are safe and without risk to health. – Maintain safe means of access to and egress from the workplace. – Ensure common areas are safe for all persons within the premises.	Duty to take reasonably practicable measures to ensure the safety of all persons within the workplace premises. 17
Manufacturer/Supplier	– Ensure machinery, equipment, or hazardous substances supplied are safe for use. – Conduct necessary testing and examination to ensure safety. – Provide adequate information on the safe use, handling, and maintenance.	Duty to ensure that articles and substances supplied for use at work are safe. 7
Company Director/Officer	– Exercise due diligence to prevent the company from committing WSH offences. – Ensure adequate resources are allocated for WSH. – Ensure WSH management systems are in place and functioning effectively.	Liability under Section 48(1) of the WSH Act; adherence to the ACOP on Directors’ WSH Duties. 19

 

Critical Subsidiary Legislation: A Practical Guide

 

The WSH Act provides the overarching framework, but the specific, day-to-day compliance obligations are detailed in its numerous subsidiary regulations. For most businesses, the following are the most critical to master.

 

The Cornerstone: WSH (Risk Management) Regulations

 

Risk Management (RM) is the bedrock of the entire WSH framework.22 These regulations legally mandate that every employer, self-employed person, and principal must conduct a risk assessment for all work activities. The

Code of Practice on WSH Risk Management provides the authoritative guidance on how to fulfill this duty.24 The process is systematic and must be documented:

1. Hazard Identification: This is the first step. The risk assessment team—which should include management, supervisors, and workers—must comprehensively identify all potential hazards. This includes not only obvious physical hazards (e.g., working at height, moving machinery) but also chemical (toxic substances), biological (viruses), ergonomic (poor workstation design), and psychosocial (workplace stress) hazards.17
2. Risk Evaluation: Once a hazard is identified, its associated risk must be evaluated. This is typically done using a risk matrix, such as the 5×5 matrix recommended in the Code of Practice, which assesses two factors: the severity of the potential harm and the likelihood of it occurring. Multiplying these two values gives a Risk Prioritisation Number (RPN), which helps to prioritize which risks require the most urgent attention.17
3. Risk Control: For each identified risk, control measures must be implemented. The regulations and Code of Practice mandate following the Hierarchy of Control, which prioritizes the most effective measures first:

• Elimination: Physically remove the hazard completely.
• Substitution: Replace the hazard with a less hazardous alternative.
• Engineering Controls: Isolate people from the hazard (e.g., install machine guards, ventilation systems).
• Administrative Controls: Change the way people work (e.g., implement safe work procedures, job rotation, warning signs).
• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Protect the worker with PPE (e.g., safety helmets, gloves). PPE is always the last line of defense.23

1. Implementation, Communication & Review: The entire risk assessment process, including the control measures implemented, must be documented. These risks and controls must be clearly communicated to all affected employees. The risk assessment records must be kept for at least three years and reviewed periodically or whenever there is a change in work processes or an incident occurs.17

 

When Things Go Wrong: WSH (Incident Reporting) Regulations

 

Even with the best risk management systems, incidents can occur. The WSH (Incident Reporting) Regulations establish a mandatory legal framework for reporting these events to MOM, ensuring transparency and enabling the authorities to identify trends and prevent recurrences.25

Businesses must report the following types of incidents:

• Fatal Accidents: Any accident at a workplace leading to the death of an employee, self-employed person, or member of the public.27
• Dangerous Occurrences (DOs): A specific list of high-potential incidents that must be reported even if no one is injured. Examples include the collapse of a crane, an explosion or fire causing work stoppage, or the collapse of a scaffold.27
• Occupational Diseases: Any disease listed in the WSH Act’s Second Schedule that an employee contracts as a result of their work (e.g., noise-induced deafness, asbestosis).25
• Injuries: Any work-related accident that results in an employee being certified by a doctor for more than three consecutive days of medical leave, or being hospitalized for at least 24 hours.25

The reporting timelines are strict. For deaths and dangerous occurrences, the employer or occupier must notify the Commissioner for WSH “as soon as is reasonably practicable” and then submit a full report within 10 days. For reportable injuries and occupational diseases, the report must be submitted within 10 days of the diagnosis or the employer receiving notice of the accident.25 

All reporting is done electronically via the MOM’s iReport system, and records of all reports must be maintained for at least three years.28 Failure to report is a serious offence, carrying fines of up to $10,000 for a first offence.27

 

High-Risk Sector Focus I: WSH (Construction) Regulations

 

The construction industry is consistently identified as a top contributor to workplace fatalities and major injuries in Singapore, prompting MOM to enact highly specific and stringent regulations for this sector.18 The WSH (Construction) Regulations 2007 apply to all worksites and impose a range of additional duties.14

A cornerstone of these regulations is the mandatory Permit-to-Work (PTW) system for high-risk construction activities. This system requires a formal written permit to be issued by a designated project manager before any of the following works can commence: demolition, excavation deeper than 1.5 meters, lifting operations with tower or mobile cranes, piling, and tunnelling.31 

The PTW process ensures that a formal risk assessment has been conducted, all necessary safety precautions are in place, and all personnel are briefed on the hazards involved before work begins.31

Other key provisions cover a wide array of construction-specific hazards, including:

• Structural Safety: Requirements for the stability of structures, supports, and formwork, including design and inspection by professional engineers.31
• Work at Height: Detailed rules for scaffolds, cantilevered platforms, guard-rails, and toe-boards to prevent falls.31
• Site Safety: Provisions for protection against falling objects, managing vehicular hazards, ensuring adequate lighting, and safe disposal of materials.31
• Electrical Safety: Specific requirements for electrical installations, wiring, and protective devices on construction sites.31

Reflecting the high-risk nature of the industry, MOM has recently intensified its focus on the construction sector. New measures under the SAFE framework include making the installation of Video Surveillance Systems (VSS) mandatory at high-risk locations on construction sites with a contract value of S$5 million or more.18 

Furthermore, Government Procurement Entities now apply more stringent safety criteria in their tender evaluations, directly linking a company’s safety record to its ability to win public sector projects.18

 

High-Risk Sector Focus II: WSH in the Manufacturing Sector

 

The manufacturing sector is another area of high focus for MOM due to its significant contribution to major workplace injuries, particularly those involving machinery.18 The WSH Act’s definition of a “factory” is broad, covering any premises where articles are made, altered, repaired, cleaned, broken up, or adapted for sale.34 

This includes traditional manufacturing plants, car-servicing workshops, and premises used for processing flammable or toxic substances.34

Key regulatory requirements for the manufacturing sector include:

• Factory Notification and Registration: Depending on the nature and scale of operations, businesses must either notify or formally register their premises as a factory with MOM before commencing operations. This is a legal prerequisite.35
• Safety and Health Management System (SHMS): The WSH (Safety and Health Management System and Auditing) Regulations mandate that certain high-risk factories must implement a formal SHMS. For example, any factory in the metalworking industry that manufactures fabricated metal products, machinery, or equipment and employs 100 or more people is required to have an SHMS in place. This SHMS must be audited by an accredited auditor at least once every 12 months.14
• Machinery Safety: Given the high incidence of amputation and other machinery-related injuries, there is a strong emphasis on the safe use of machinery. This includes ensuring that dangerous parts are securely guarded, providing proper training to operators, developing Safe Work Procedures (SWPs), and implementing lock-out/tag-out procedures for maintenance and repair work.36
• Management of Hazardous Substances: For factories that handle flammable, corrosive, or toxic substances, specific guidelines apply. These include establishing procedures for the procurement, storage, safe use, and disposal of hazardous chemicals, providing designated and properly labeled storage areas, and ensuring workers are trained and equipped with the correct PPE.36

 

The Cost of Non-Compliance: MOM Enforcement and Penalties

 

MOM’s enforcement regime is robust and backed by severe penalties designed to underscore the gravity of WSH obligations. Businesses that fail to comply face a multi-faceted penalty framework that can impact them financially, operationally, and reputationally.

 

Understanding the Penalty Framework: Fines, Stop-Work Orders, and Imprisonment

 

The penalties for breaching the WSH Act are among the highest in Singapore’s corporate law. For a corporate body, a first conviction can result in a fine of up to S500,000,whichdoublestoS1 million for a repeat offender. 

For individuals, including company directors and employees, penalties can reach a S$200,000 fine and/or up to two years of imprisonment.3

Recognizing that some of the most critical safety lapses occur due to breaches of subsidiary legislation, MOM significantly increased the maximum fines for these regulations effective from June 1, 2024. The new tiered structure is based on the potential for harm:

• S$50,000 Maximum Fine: For offences that are a major cause of serious harm (death, serious injury, or a dangerous occurrence). This includes critical failures such as not conducting a risk assessment or failing to implement protective structures to prevent falls.32
• S$20,000 Maximum Fine: For offences that contribute to, but are not the major cause of, serious harm. This includes failures in supporting measures like reviewing the SHMS or appointing a WSH officer.40
• S$10,000 and below: For less serious procedural or administrative offences, such as failing to keep certain records.40

In addition to fines, MOM has the power to issue Remedial Orders (requiring a company to fix a specific lapse) and Stop-Work Orders (SWOs), which can halt all or part of a company’s operations until safety issues are rectified. 

Non-compliance with an SWO can lead to a staggering fine of up to S500,000plusanadditionalS20,000 for each day the offence continues.39

 

The Demerit Point System: How It Impacts Your Ability to Hire

 

For companies in the high-risk construction and manufacturing sectors, MOM employs a Demerit Point System that links WSH performance directly to the ability to hire migrant workers.42 Demerit points are issued for various offences, with the number of points reflecting the severity of the breach:

• Full Stop-Work Order: 10 points
• Prosecution for a Dangerous Occurrence or Major Injury: 25 points
• Prosecution for a Fatality (more than one person): 50 points

If a company accumulates 25 or more demerit points within an 18-month period, it will be debarred from applying for any new work passes for migrant workers for a period of three months. 

The debarment period increases with the number of points accumulated, extending up to two years. For companies that accumulate 125 points or more, the debarment extends to the renewal of existing work passes, effectively crippling their workforce.42

 

Case Studies in WSH Lapses: Lessons from Recent Prosecutions

 

Recent prosecutions by MOM provide powerful, real-world illustrations of the legal consequences of WSH failures and highlight the regulator’s enforcement priorities.

• Case 1: Leadership Culpability and Tampering with Evidence. In March 2025, a director of Dyna-Log Singapore was personally fined S8,000afterheinstructedanemployeetotamperwiththesceneofafatalworkplaceaccidentbyreplacingthedeceasedworker′sslipperswithsafetyboots.ThecompanyitselfwasfinedS200,000 for the underlying safety lapses that led to the fatality. This case underscores MOM’s willingness to prosecute not just the corporate entity but also the individuals in leadership who attempt to obstruct justice or are found to be culpable for the incident.43
• Case 2: Gross Negligence in High-Risk Operations. The case of Hiap Seng Lorry Enterprises remains a landmark example of individual accountability. The sole proprietor was fined S$140,000—the highest fine imposed on an individual at the time—for a fatal incident involving an unsafe lifting operation. Investigations revealed a catastrophic failure to meet basic safety requirements: the lifting chain was in poor condition, workers were untrained, and there was no lifting plan or appointed lifting supervisor as required by regulations. The case demonstrates that for high-risk activities, simply “getting the job done” at the expense of safety can lead to tragic and financially ruinous outcomes.44
• Case 3: Systemic Failures in a Public Body. In a significant move that highlights universal accountability, charges were filed in December 2023 against the National Environment Agency (NEA) itself, as well as two of its senior managers, following a fatal explosion at the Tuas Incineration Plant in 2021. The charges allege failures in the Permit-to-Work system and inadequate implementation of control measures. This case sends a clear message that all organizations, including government and statutory bodies, are subject to the WSH Act and will be held to the same high standards of safety and health management.45

These cases collectively show a clear enforcement pattern: MOM investigates incidents thoroughly to identify root causes, which often trace back to systemic failures in risk management, training, and supervision. 

Crucially, the authorities are increasingly focused on holding the individuals in management and leadership positions, who have the power and responsibility to implement these systems, directly accountable for their failures.19

 

Part 2: Championing Environmental Responsibility – Meeting NEA’s Standards

 

While MOM governs the internal workplace environment, the National Environment Agency (NEA) regulates a business’s external impact. Through a robust legislative framework, the NEA ensures that Singapore’s rapid economic development does not come at the cost of environmental degradation or public health.

 

Deep Dive: The Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA)

 

A Framework for a Green City: The Scope and Aims of the EPMA

 

The Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA) is Singapore’s principal legislation for environmental protection. First enacted in 1999, it consolidates laws relating to the control of air, water, land, and noise pollution, and provides a comprehensive regulatory framework for the management of hazardous substances and waste.8 

The Act is administered by the Director-General of Environmental Protection, an office within the NEA, who is granted broad powers to set standards, issue licenses, and enforce compliance.47

The overarching aim of the EPMA is to safeguard human health and the environment through a system of proactive controls and stringent standards. It empowers the NEA to regulate industrial activities from their inception, ensuring that environmental considerations are integrated into the planning and operational phases of any business.10

 

Controlling Your Footprint: Key Provisions for Air, Water, and Noise Pollution

 

The EPMA is structured into several parts, each addressing a specific area of environmental concern. For businesses, the most relevant parts grant the NEA the authority to:

• Control Air Pollution (Part 4): This section requires occupiers of premises to maintain and operate air pollution control equipment and prohibits the emission of dark smoke and other air impurities beyond prescribed limits.49
• Control Water Pollution (Part 5): This section mandates written permission for the discharge of trade effluent and other polluting matters into water bodies and sets penalties for the illegal discharge of toxic or hazardous substances.49
• Control Hazardous Substances (Part 7): This section establishes a strict licensing and permit regime for the importation, manufacture, sale, storage, and use of substances deemed hazardous by the NEA.49
• Control Noise (Part 8): This section provides the authority to regulate noise emissions from construction sites and other workplaces to mitigate their impact on the surrounding community.49

 

Navigating Key Environmental Regulations

 

The broad powers granted by the EPMA are given specific effect through a series of detailed subsidiary regulations. These regulations set the technical standards and compliance obligations that businesses must meet.

 

Hazardous Substances Control: A Strict Licensing Regime

 

The NEA maintains a stringent “cradle-to-grave” approach to the management of hazardous substances. Under the EPMA and the Environmental Protection and Management (Hazardous Substances) Regulations, any company that intends to import, sell, export, purchase, store, or transport controlled hazardous substances must obtain the appropriate approvals from the NEA.6 

The list of controlled substances is specified in the Second Schedule of the EPMA and is regularly updated to include chemicals of concern, such as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) regulated under international conventions like the Stockholm Convention.50

There are four primary types of compliance approvals:

1. Hazardous Substances Licence: Required for importing, selling, or exporting controlled substances.
2. Hazardous Substances Permit: Required for purchasing, storing, or using controlled substances.
3. Transport Approval: Required for transporting controlled substances above specified quantity thresholds.
4. Import Approval: A specific approval tied to the import process via TradeNet.6

Companies handling these substances are subject to strict operational requirements, including maintaining detailed records of quantities, ensuring storage containers are properly designed and labeled, restricting access to storage areas, and providing comprehensive training to all personnel on the nature of the hazards and emergency response procedures.54

 

Air Quality Compliance: Understanding the Environmental Protection and Management (Air Impurities) Regulations

 

To protect public health, the NEA enforces strict air quality standards. The Environmental Protection and Management (Air Impurities) Regulations set legally binding emission limits for a wide range of pollutants from industrial and trade premises.56 

Singapore’s ambient air quality targets are benchmarked against World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines for pollutants such as Sulphur Dioxide (SO2​), Particulate Matter (PM2.5​), and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2​).57

The regulations specify the maximum concentration of various air impurities that can be emitted from any fuel-burning equipment or industrial plant. The list is extensive and includes limits for substances like carbon monoxide, lead, mercury, arsenic, benzene, and formaldehyde.58 

Occupiers of industrial premises may be required by the Director-General to install monitoring instruments (e.g., smoke density indicators, closed-circuit television) to ensure continuous compliance. They must also carry out emission tests as required and maintain a register of these tests for inspection.56

 

Water Pollution Control: Decoding the Environmental Protection and Management (Trade Effluent) Regulations

 

Singapore’s limited water resources necessitate extremely strict controls on water pollution. The Environmental Protection and Management (Trade Effluent) Regulations prohibit the discharge of any trade effluent—liquid waste generated from commercial or industrial activities—into any watercourse or onto land without prior written permission from the NEA.59

The regulations lay out a detailed list of prohibited substances and permissible discharge limits for various parameters. It is absolutely forbidden to discharge trade effluent containing:

• Radioactive material
• Pesticides
• Petroleum or other inflammable solvents
• Solid matter like garbage or sawdust.60

For other substances, the regulations specify maximum allowable concentrations, with even stricter limits for discharge into a “controlled watercourse” (a water source used for public water supply). Key parameters include temperature (not to exceed 45°C), pH value (between 6 and 9), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and a long list of heavy metals and chemicals such as cadmium, mercury, lead, cyanide, and arsenic.60 

Businesses are required to install pre-treatment facilities to ensure their effluent meets these standards before discharge and must also provide sampling points for NEA inspection.59

 

Noise Management: Adhering to the Environmental Protection and Management (Noise) Regulations

 

To maintain a livable urban environment, the NEA regulates noise levels from construction sites and factories. The Environmental Protection and Management (Control of Noise at Construction Sites) Regulations set maximum permissible noise levels that vary depending on the time of day and the type of premises affected.62

The limits are strictest during the night (11 pm to 7 am) and for noise-sensitive premises like hospitals and schools. For example, for a construction site near a residential building (less than 150m away), the permissible noise level is 75 dBA during the day (7 am – 7 pm) but is significantly lower in the evening and at night.64 A strict

“No Work Rule” is enforced for construction sites near residential and noise-sensitive premises, prohibiting work from 10:00 pm on a Saturday or eve of a public holiday until 7:00 am on the following Monday or the day after the public holiday.64 Similar boundary noise limits are also in place for factory premises under separate regulations.64

Section	Parameter / Substance	Emission/Discharge Limit (Non-Controlled Watercourse)	Emission/Discharge Limit (Controlled Watercourse)
Air Emissions	Oxides of Nitrogen (as NO2​)	400 mg/Nm3	N/A
	Particulate Substances	50 mg/Nm3 (for new plants)	N/A
	Carbon Monoxide	250 mg/Nm3	N/A
	Lead and its compounds	0.5 mg/Nm3	N/A
	Mercury and its compounds	0.05 mg/Nm3	N/A
Trade Effluent	Temperature	45°C	45°C
	pH Value	6.0 – 9.0	6.0 – 9.0
	Total Suspended Solids (TSS)	50 mg/L	30 mg/L
	Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)	50 mg/L	20 mg/L
	Cyanide (as CN)	0.1 mg/L	0.1 mg/L
	Mercury	0.05 mg/L	0.001 mg/L
	Total Metals (combined)	1 mg/L	0.5 mg/L

 

Deep Dive: The Resource Sustainability Act (RSA)

 

Embracing the Circular Economy: An Introduction to the RSA

 

The Resource Sustainability Act (RSA) represents the latest evolution in Singapore’s environmental policy, moving beyond pollution control to address the entire lifecycle of products. It is a key legislative tool for achieving the goals of the Singapore Green Plan and the Zero Waste Masterplan, aiming to build a circular economy where resources are reused and recycled for as long as possible.11 

The Act targets specific waste streams that have high generation rates and low recycling rates, placing new responsibilities on businesses to manage the waste generated by their products.65

The RSA’s introduction of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework marks a fundamental redefinition of environmental liability. Traditionally, under the EPMA, a company’s responsibility was largely confined to controlling pollution at its source—the factory chimney or the effluent pipe.49 Once a product was sold, the responsibility for its disposal fell to the consumer and the public waste management system. 

The RSA changes this paradigm by making “producers”—defined as companies that manufacture or import products for the local market—legally and financially responsible for the collection and proper treatment of their products at the end of their life.2 This means a company is no longer just accountable for its production process; it is now accountable for the television it sold five years ago or the plastic bottle it filled and distributed. 

This shift has profound strategic implications, compelling businesses to consider end-of-life management in their product design, supply chain logistics (e.g., establishing reverse logistics for product take-back), and financial planning.13

 

Your Obligations for Priority Waste Streams: E-Waste, Food Waste, and Packaging

 

The RSA is being implemented in phases, focusing initially on three priority waste streams:

• Electrical and Electronic Waste (E-Waste): Under the EPR framework, producers of regulated consumer products (e.g., air-conditioners, refrigerators, televisions, laptops) must register with the NEA and join a licensed Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS). The PRS operator is responsible for organizing the nationwide collection and proper recycling of e-waste on behalf of its member producers.11 Retailers also have obligations; for instance, a retailer delivering a new large appliance must offer a free, one-for-one take-back of the consumer’s old appliance.11
• Food Waste: The RSA targets large commercial and industrial generators of food waste, such as hotels, malls, and large food manufacturers. These premises are required to segregate their food waste from other waste for off-site treatment or to treat it on-site. Furthermore, new developments that are expected to be large food waste generators must allocate space for on-site food waste treatment systems in their design plans from the outset.11
• Packaging Waste: To tackle the growing problem of packaging waste, the RSA introduces a mandatory reporting framework. Companies with an annual turnover above S$10 million that supply packaged products or use specified packaging must report data on the types and amounts of packaging they introduce into the Singapore market to the NEA. They are also required to develop and submit a 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) plan outlining their strategies to minimize packaging waste.11

 

Waste Stream	Obligated Party	Key Requirement
E-Waste	Producer/Importer	Register with NEA and join a licensed Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS) to finance and manage the collection and recycling of regulated products. 13
	Retailer	Provide free 1-for-1 take-back service for products of the same class upon delivery. Large retailers must provide in-store collection bins. 11
Food Waste	Manager of large commercial/industrial buildings	Segregate food waste for proper treatment (on-site or off-site). New developments must allocate space for on-site treatment systems. 11
Packaging Waste	Producer/Importer (with >S$10m turnover)	Annually report packaging data to NEA. Submit a 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) plan outlining reduction and recycling strategies. 11

 

The Cost of Non-Compliance: NEA Enforcement and Penalties

 

The NEA backs its regulations with a strong enforcement posture. Its officers are empowered to conduct inspections, and the agency utilizes technology like online sensors in public sewers to detect illegal discharges.48 Non-compliance with the EPMA or RSA can result in significant penalties.

 

Fines and Sanctions for Environmental Breaches

 

Under the EPMA, penalties can be severe. For instance, illegally discharging toxic or hazardous substances into inland waters can lead to a fine of up to S50,000and/orimprisonmentforupto12monthsforafirstoffence.[10,59,67]DischargingpollutingmatterwithoutpermissioncanattractafineofuptoS20,000, with further daily fines for continuing offences.67 

The RSA also includes penalties for non-compliance, such as fines for producers who fail to register under the EPR scheme or submit their mandatory packaging reports.11

 

Case Studies in Environmental Violations: Learning from Others’ Mistakes

 

Real-world enforcement actions by the NEA demonstrate the tangible risks of environmental non-compliance.

• Case 1: Illegal Discharge of Trade Effluent. In 2023, three companies were prosecuted and fined for illegally dumping toxic and hazardous substances into public sewers. One company, Chem-Solv Technologies, was fined S8,500afterbeingcaughtdischargingwastecontainingdangerouslyhighlevelsoftoluene,whichcouldhaveposedafireorexplosionhazardintheseweragesystem.Another,NSLOilChemLogistics,wasfinedS13,000 for discharging effluent with heavy metals and boron exceeding permissible levels. These cases highlight that the NEA actively monitors the sewer network and will trace illegal discharges back to their source, leading to prosecution.66
• Case 2: Extra-territorial Enforcement for Haze Pollution. The NEA has demonstrated the reach of Singapore’s environmental laws through its use of the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA). In 2015, during a severe haze episode, the NEA issued preventive measures notices to six Indonesian companies to extinguish fires on their land. When some failed to respond, the NEA obtained a court warrant against a director of one of the companies, meaning he could be detained for investigation upon entering Singapore. This case shows that the NEA will use its legal powers to hold entities accountable for environmental damage affecting Singapore, even if the source is outside its borders.67

These examples serve as a clear warning: the NEA has a low tolerance for environmental violations and possesses a robust toolkit of monitoring and enforcement powers to ensure compliance.

 

Part 3: From Compliance to Excellence – Implementing a Robust EHS Management System

 

Navigating the complex web of MOM and NEA regulations requires more than just a reactive, checklist-based approach. True, sustainable compliance is achieved by embedding EHS principles into the very fabric of an organization. 

This involves building a systematic framework that proactively manages risks, ensures continual improvement, and leverages the extensive support ecosystem available to businesses in Singapore.

 

Building a Framework for Success: ISO 14001 and ISO 45001

 

International standards provide a globally recognized and structured framework for developing and implementing effective management systems. For EHS, the two most critical standards are ISO 14001 for Environmental Management and ISO 45001 for Occupational Health and Safety Management. 

Both NEA and MOM encourage the adoption of these standards as a means of demonstrating a systematic approach to compliance and risk management.1

 

ISO 14001 (Environmental Management): A Practical Implementation Guide

 

ISO 14001 provides the criteria for an Environmental Management System (EMS). It helps an organization control its environmental aspects, reduce impacts, and ensure legal compliance. For an SME embarking on this journey, the process can be broken down into the following steps based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle 1:

1. Develop an Environmental Policy: Top management must define and endorse a clear policy that outlines the organization’s commitment to environmental protection, pollution prevention, and legal compliance.70
2. Plan: This is the most critical phase. The organization must identify all its environmental aspects (e.g., air emissions, water discharge, waste generation), determine which ones have significant impacts, identify all applicable legal requirements (from the EPMA, RSA, etc.), and set measurable environmental objectives and targets.1
3. Implement (Do): This involves allocating resources, defining roles and responsibilities, and providing necessary training to ensure competence. The organization must establish operational controls (e.g., procedures for waste handling, chemical storage) and develop an emergency preparedness and response plan.1
4. Check: Performance must be monitored and measured against the set objectives. This includes conducting regular internal audits of the EMS to ensure it is functioning as intended and conforming to the ISO 14001 standard. Records of monitoring and audits must be maintained.1
5. Act: The results of the performance checks and audits are presented to top management in a formal management review. This review assesses the suitability and effectiveness of the EMS and identifies opportunities for improvement. The organization must then take corrective actions to address any non-conformities and drive continual improvement of its environmental performance.1

 

ISO 45001 (Occupational Health & Safety): A Step-by-Step Approach

 

ISO 45001 provides a similar framework for an Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) Management System, designed to prevent work-related injury and ill health. It is the international successor to the OHSAS 18001 standard and is fully compatible with Singapore’s WSH framework.72 The implementation steps are parallel to those for ISO 14001:

1. Conduct a Gap Analysis: Before starting, assess the organization’s current OH&S practices against the requirements of ISO 45001 to identify gaps that need to be addressed.73
2. Establish OH&S Policy and Objectives: Leadership must establish a clear OH&S policy demonstrating its commitment to providing a safe and healthy workplace. This includes a commitment to eliminating hazards, reducing risks, and consulting with workers. Specific, measurable OH&S objectives should be set.73
3. Implement Controls and Procedures: This involves putting into practice the core elements of the WSH Act, such as the risk management process (hazard identification, risk assessment, and control), incident investigation procedures, and emergency preparedness plans. Employee training and competency are critical components.73
4. Conduct Internal Audits and Management Reviews: The organization must periodically conduct internal audits to verify that the OH&S management system is effective and compliant. The findings are then reviewed by top management to assess performance and drive improvements.73
5. Prepare Documentation: Comprehensive documentation is essential. This includes the OH&S policy, risk assessments, safe work procedures, training records, incident reports, and audit findings. This documentation serves as evidence of compliance for both internal and external audits.73

 

The Power of Integration: Creating a Unified EHS Management System

 

Many organizations find significant benefits in creating an Integrated Management System (IMS) that combines the requirements of ISO 9001 (Quality), ISO 14001 (Environment), and ISO 45001 (Health & Safety). Since these standards share a common high-level structure (Annex SL), integrating them can:

• Reduce Duplication: Avoids having separate policies, manuals, and procedures for each system.
• Streamline Audits: Allows for combined internal and external audits, saving time and resources.
• Provide a Holistic View: Gives management a unified view of business risk and performance across quality, environmental, and safety metrics, leading to more effective decision-making.1

 

Practical Resources for Singaporean Businesses (Especially SMEs)

 

The Singaporean government has strategically paired its stringent regulatory regime with a comprehensive ecosystem of support programs and financial incentives, recognizing that achieving high national EHS standards requires enabling businesses, not just penalizing them. 

This is particularly true for SMEs, which may lack the in-house expertise or resources to navigate complex regulations alone. For an SME, the key takeaway is that a clear, government-endorsed path exists to help them achieve compliance and improve safety standards; they are not expected to undertake this journey solo.

 

Leveraging WSH Council Programmes: A Guide to bizSAFE, StartSAFE, and Total WSH

 

The Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Council, a statutory board under MOM, offers a suite of highly effective, often free, capability-building programmes:

• bizSAFE: This is a nationally recognized, five-level programme designed to help companies build their WSH capabilities. It provides a clear, step-by-step pathway for companies to establish a robust safety management system.

• Level 1: Requires a top executive to attend a workshop on WSH duties.
• Level 2: Requires a staff member to be trained as a WSH risk management champion.
• Level 3: Involves engaging an accredited auditor to audit the implementation of the risk management system.
• Level 4: Requires a staff member to be trained as a WSH management system champion.
• Level STAR: Achieved when the company obtains SS ISO 45001 certification.68
  
  Many large project owners and government tenders now require contractors to have a certain level of bizSAFE certification, making it a commercial necessity.

• StartSAFE: This is a free programme specifically tailored for SMEs. It pairs the company with a WSH professional who provides hands-on guidance to identify workplace risks, rectify lapses, understand legal obligations under the WSH Act, and develop key documents like a WSH policy and a Safe Work Procedure.76
• Total WSH: This is a holistic, one-year assistance programme that goes beyond traditional safety to include worker health and well-being. It helps companies identify and address a broader range of risks, including those related to mental health and ergonomics, and design intervention programmes for employees.75

 

Financial Support and Incentives for EHS Improvement

 

To encourage the adoption of better EHS practices and technologies, various financial schemes are available:

• Grants for Technology Adoption: The Lorry Crane Stability Control System Grant provides co-funding of up to 50% (capped at S$5,000 per crane) for companies to install systems that prevent crane overturning, a common cause of serious accidents.78
• Tax Incentives: The Tax Incentives Scheme for Noise Hazard Control and the Tax Incentives Scheme for Chemical Hazards Control allow companies to claim accelerated depreciation on capital expenditure for new equipment that significantly reduces worker exposure to these hazards.78
• Insurance Premium Discounts: In a clear demonstration of how good WSH can lead to direct financial benefits, the WSH Council has partnered with insurers like Singlife. SMEs that participate in the free Total WSH Programme are eligible for a 10% discount on their group insurance premiums, creating a tangible financial incentive for investing in worker health and safety.79

In addition, MOM is actively leveraging SME Centres and their Business Advisors as channels to disseminate bite-sized WSH resources and provide consultation, making it easier for small businesses to access the help they need.77

 

Conclusion: Embedding EHS into Your Corporate DNA

 

Beyond the Law: The Business Case for EHS Excellence

 

Compliance with the regulations set forth by MOM and the NEA is the baseline, the non-negotiable minimum for operating in Singapore. However, the most resilient and successful businesses understand that EHS is not about avoiding penalties; it is about creating value. A deeply embedded EHS culture delivers a powerful return on investment.

It reduces direct costs associated with accidents, such as medical expenses, insurance premium hikes, and equipment damage, as well as indirect costs like lost productivity and administrative time spent on investigations.3 It boosts employee morale and engagement, as workers feel valued and protected, leading to higher retention and productivity. 

It enhances corporate reputation, making the company a more attractive partner for clients, a more appealing investment for financiers, and a more desirable employer for top talent. In a global marketplace that increasingly scrutinizes supply chains for ethical and sustainable practices, a certified and proven EHS management system is a significant competitive advantage.69

 

A Final Checklist for EHS Compliance in Singapore

 

For business leaders seeking to ensure their organization is on the right track, this final checklist summarizes the critical action points derived from Singapore’s key EHS regulations:

• Leadership Commitment:

• Has top management formally endorsed a company-wide WSH Policy and an Environmental Policy?
• Are sufficient financial and human resources allocated to EHS management?
• Are C-suite executives and directors aware of their personal liabilities under the WSH Act and the ACOP for Directors’ WSH Duties?

• Risk Management (WSH):

• Have comprehensive risk assessments been conducted for all routine and non-routine work activities?
• Are these risk assessments documented, communicated to all relevant staff, and reviewed regularly (at least every three years or after an incident)?
• Is the Hierarchy of Control being correctly applied to mitigate identified risks?

• Incident & Emergency Management:

• Is there a clear, documented procedure for reporting workplace incidents to MOM that adheres to the strict legal timelines?
• Is there a robust emergency response plan in place for potential scenarios like fires, chemical spills, or medical emergencies?

• Environmental Compliance (NEA):

• Does the company possess the necessary NEA licenses or permits for the import, storage, or use of any controlled hazardous substances?
• Are air emissions and trade effluent discharges monitored and confirmed to be within the legal limits specified in the relevant regulations?
• Are noise levels from the premises managed in accordance with NEA’s boundary limits?

• Resource Sustainability (RSA):

• Has the company determined if it has obligations under the RSA for e-waste, food waste, or packaging waste?
• If applicable, has the company registered with the NEA, joined a PRS, or prepared its mandatory packaging reports and 3R plans?

• Systems & Capability Building:

• Are employees at all levels receiving adequate and regular EHS training?
• Is the company leveraging the support of WSH Council programmes like bizSAFE or StartSAFE to build its capabilities?
• Is the organization actively working towards or maintaining an integrated EHS management system, such as one certified to ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 standards?

By systematically addressing these points, businesses in Singapore can move beyond the anxiety of compliance and confidently build a safe, healthy, and environmentally responsible organization that is poised for sustainable success.

Works cited

1. Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) in Singapore – Stendard, accessed July 25, 2025, https://stendard.com/en-sg/blog/ehs-singapore/
2. Singapore Resource Sustainability Act 2019 (Revised in 2021) – Global Plastics Policy Centre – University of Portsmouth, accessed July 25, 2025, https://plasticspolicy.port.ac.uk/policy-reviews/singapore-resource-sustainability-act-2019-revised-in-2021/
3. Singapore’s Workplace Safety and Health Act Guide – Omni HR, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.omnihr.co/blog/workplace-safety-and-health-act
4. Workplace Safety and Health Act – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/workplace-safety-and-health-act
5. Workplace safety and health – Singapore – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health
6. Visit the Regulation Details of Singapore Regulatory Region | GPC Gateway, accessed July 25, 2025, https://gpcgateway.com/common/regulation/NDQ-/U2luZ2Fwb3Jl
7. Workplace Safety and Health Act: what it covers – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/workplace-safety-and-health-act/what-it-covers
8. Singapore Environmental Protection and Management Act 1999 (Revised in 2020) – Global Plastics Policy Centre – University of Portsmouth, accessed July 25, 2025, https://plasticspolicy.port.ac.uk/policy-reviews/singapore-environmental-protection-and-management-act-1999-revised-in-2020/
9. Environmental Protection and Management Act (Chapter 94A) | AMP EID, accessed July 25, 2025, https://ampeid.org/documents/singapore/environmental-protection-and-management-act-(chapter-94a)/
10. Alert 22 – Singapore EPMA 1999 – IAEG, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.iaeg.com/binaries/content/assets/iaeg/wg9/iaeg_alert_singapore_epma_1999.pdf
11. Resource Sustainability Act – Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.qwp.sg/client-update/resource-sustainability-act/
12. Singapore – Resource Sustainability Act 2019 (Act 29 of 2019). – NATLEX, accessed July 25, 2025, https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/r/natlex/fe/details?p3_isn=109959
13. Resource Sustainability Act 2019 partially in force from 1 January 2020 – Allen & Gledhill, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.allenandgledhill.com/sg/publication/articles/13990/resource-sustainability-act-2019-partially-in-force-from-1-january-2020
14. Legislation for workplace safety and health – Singapore – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/legislation/workplace-safety-and-health
15. Workplace Safety and Health Act – Wikipedia, accessed July 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_Safety_and_Health_Act
16. Workplace Safety and Health Act – American Crane School, accessed July 25, 2025, https://americancraneschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Singapore_Crane_Regulations_Guide-To-Workplace-Safety-And-Health-Act.pdf
17. Cleaning and Custodial Services – Workplace Safety and Health Guidelines, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/-/media/TAL/Wshc/Resources/Publications/WSH-Guidelines/Files/WSH_Guidelines_Cleaning_and_Custodial_Services.pdf
18. MOM Announces New SAFE Measures for More Sustainable WSH Outcomes, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.rajahtannasia.com/viewpoints/mom-announces-new-safe-measures-for-more-sustainable-wsh-outcomes/
19. List of Offenders Convicted under Workplace Safety and Health Act, 2024 – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/-/media/mom/documents/safety-health/reports-stats/list-of-offenders-convicted-under-wsha-2024.pdf
20. Frequently Asked Questions: Approved Code of Practice on Chief Executives’ and Board of Directors’ Workplace Safety and Health Duties – Singapore Institute of Directors, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sid.org.sg/common/Uploaded%20files/Resources/2023_01_04_ACOPwshcFAQ.pdf
21. CEOs and directors face prosecution for workplace safety lapses if they are culpable: Zaqy, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/ceos-and-directors-face-prosecution-for-workplace-safety-lapses-if-they-are-culpable-zaqy
22. WSH Risk Management Regulations in Singapore | NGT Safety Solutions, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ngt.com.sg/wsh-risk-management-regulations/
23. Risk management – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/safety-and-health-management-systems/risk-management
24. Code of Practice On: Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Risk …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/560726824/CodeOfPractice-RiskManagement-ThirdRevision
25. Workplace Safety and Health (Incident Reporting) Regulations | PDF | Employment – Scribd, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/595874573/Workplace-Safety-and-Health-Incident-Reporting-Regulations
26. www.tal.sg, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/topics/general-safety/incident-investigation#:~:text=As%20employers%20and%2For%20occupiers,WSH%20(Incident%20Reporting)%20Regulations.
27. Work-related accidents: what and when to report – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/work-accident-reporting/what-and-when-to-report
28. Workplace Safety and Health (Incident Reporting) Regulations …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/WSHA2006-RG3?DocDate=20140102&ProvIds=P1IV-
29. WSH Construction Regulations in Singapore: A Comprehensive Guide – Hubble.Build, accessed July 25, 2025, https://hubble.build/newsroom/wsh-construction-regulations-singapore-comprehensive-guide
30. $230,000 in fines issued after MOM checks safety at over 500 workplaces from April to June, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sg.news.yahoo.com/230-000-fines-issued-mom-041500024.html
31. Workplace Safety and Health (Construction) Regulations 2007 …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/wsha2006-s663-2007?ProvIds=P1III-
32. New WSH Measures from 1 June 2024: Increase in Maximum Fines, Mandatory Video Surveillance Systems for Relevant Construction Projects | Rajah & Tann Asia, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.rajahtannasia.com/viewpoints/new-wsh-measures-from-1-june-2024-increase-in-maximum-fines-mandatory-video-surveillance-systems-for-relevant-construction-projects/
33. WSH requirements in public sector construction and construction-related projects – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/safe-measures/sectoral-level/wsh-requirements-in-public-sector-construction-and-construction-related-projects
34. WSH Act: what is a factory – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/factory-notification-and-registration/what-is-a-factory
35. Workplace Safety and Health (Registration of Factories) Regulations 2008 – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/WSHA2006-S501-2008
36. Workplace Safety and Health Guidelines – Implementation of WSH …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/-/media/tal/wshc/resources/publications/wsh-guidelines/files/wsh-guidelines_implementation-of-wsh-management-system-for-the-metalworking-industry.ashx
37. MANUFACTURING SECTOR: – AAT Training Hub, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.aattraininghub.com/WSHC-media/ChecklistsandArticles/WSH_Articles_Amputations%20_in_Metalworking.pdf
38. WSH Guidelines on Safe Use of Machinery, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/-/media/tal/wshc/resources/publications/wsh-guidelines/files/wsh_guidelines_on_safe_use_of_machinery.pdf
39. WSH Act: liabilities and penalties – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/workplace-safety-and-health-act/liabilities-and-penalties
40. MOM implements increases in maximum fines and mandatory video surveillance to improve workplace safety and health – Allen & Gledhill, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.allenandgledhill.com/sg/publication/articles/28276/mom-implements-increases-in-maximum-fines-and-mandatory-video-surveillance-to-improve-workplace-safety-and-health
41. Action against errant companies​ – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/safe-measures/action-against-errant-companies
42. Demerit point system for construction and manufacturing sectors – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/monitoring-and-surveillance/demerit-point-system
43. Fine for director who instructed employee to place safety boots at the scene of a fatal workplace accident – CNA, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/company-director-fined-instructing-employee-replace-slippers-deceased-fatal-accident-safety-boots-5012581
44. Highest Fine Imposed on Individual Under Workplace Safety and Health Act – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/press-releases/2019/0913-highest-fine-imposed-on-individual-under-workplace-safety-and-health-act
45. Ministerial Statement on Charges Against NEA on Incident at Tuas Incineration Plant – Ms Grace Fu | Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mse.gov.sg/latest-news/ministerial-statement-on-charges-against-nea-on-incident-at-tuas-incineration-plant
46. Charges Against NEA and Two of its Employees Under WSHA – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/press-releases/2023/charges-against-nea-and-two-of-its-employees-under-wsha
47. SINGAPORE: Environmental Protection and Management Act (Act 9 of 1999) (2022 Ed.), accessed July 25, 2025, https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/node/2908
48. Environmental pollution control in Singapore: The intersection of torts, statutes, regulations and community norms – InK@SMU.edu.sg, accessed July 25, 2025, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4968/viewcontent/10.2478_vjls_2020_0005_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
49. Environmental Protection and Management Act 1999 – Singapore …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/epma1999
50. Singapore, EHS Compliance | Enviliance ASIA, accessed July 25, 2025, https://enviliance.com/categories/southeast-asia/sg
51. Singapore List of Controlled Hazardous Substances under EMPA – ChemRadar, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.chemradar.com/tools/cis/inv/649a325e7ba20a1a4f5fd7b2
52. Singapore Regulates Two Persistent Chemicals | SGS Belgium, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.sgs.com/en-be/news/2025/02/safeguards-03025-singapore-regulates-two-persistent-chemicals
53. National Environment Agency – Chemical Control and Management Department (Hazardous Substances) – Singapore Customs, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.customs.gov.sg/businesses/national-single-window/tradenet/competent-authorities-requirements/hazardous-substances/
54. Environmental Protection and Management Act – NUS Chemistry – National University of Singapore, accessed July 25, 2025, https://chemistry.nus.edu.sg/health-safety/more-safety-information/applicable-legislations/environmental-protection-and-management-act/
55. Environmental Protection and Management (Hazardous Substances) Regulations – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/EPMA1999-RG4?DocDate=20110801&ProvIds=P1IV-
56. Environmental Protection and Management (Air Impurities) Regulations – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/sl/epma1999-rg8
57. Clean Air | Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mse.gov.sg/policies/clean-air
58. Environmental Protection and Management (Air Impurities) Regulations – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/EPMA1999-RG8?ProvIds=Sc-
59. Question by MP Mr Yee Chia Hsing: To ask the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources whether the Ministry will consider – National Archives of Singapore, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/MSE_20180709005.pdf
60. Environmental Protection and Management (Trade Effluent …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/EPMA1999-RG5
61. NEA – Allowable Limits For Trade Effluent Discharge To Watercourse or Controlled Watercourse | PDF | Cyanide – Scribd, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/558074202/NEA-Allowable-Limits-for-Trade-Effluent-Discharge-to-Watercourse-or-Controlled-Watercourse
62. Environmental Protection and Management (Control of Noise At …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/sl/epma1999-rg2
63. NEA Construction Noise | PDF | Human Impact On The Environment – Scribd, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/657197411/NEA-Construction-Noise
64. Singapore Noise Regulations, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.noisyneighboursingapore.com/articles/singapore-noise-regulations/
65. The Resource Sustainability Act | Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mse.gov.sg/latest-news/resource-sustainability-act
66. 3 firms fined for illegally dumping toxic waste into public sewers | The Straits Times, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/3-firms-fined-for-illegally-dumping-toxic-waste-into-public-sewers
67. Legal Recourse for Environmental Damage in Singapore – SingaporeLegalAdvice.com, accessed July 25, 2025, https://singaporelegaladvice.com/legal-recourse-environmental-damage-singapore/
68. Safety and Health Management System, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/topics/wsh-management-systems/safety-and-health-management-system
69. ISO 14001 Certification in Singapore | Environmental Management System | TopCertifier, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.topcertifier.com/iso-14001-certification-in-singapore
70. 5-Step Guide to an EHS Management System that Works | SafetyStratus, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.safetystratus.com/blog/5-step-guide-to-an-ehs-management-system-that-works/
71. ISO 14001 EMS Certification in Singapore – TÜV SÜD, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tuvsud.com/en-sg/services/auditing-and-system-certification/iso-14001
72. ISO 45001 Certification – IAS Singapore, accessed July 25, 2025, https://ias-singapore.com/iso-45001-certification-in-singapore/
73. What steps should a Company take to prepare for the ISO 45001 certification audit?, accessed July 25, 2025, https://factocert.com/iso-45001-certification-in-singapore-prepare-audit/
74. ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 – Integrated Management Systems – Introduction Training Course – SGS, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.sgs.com/en-sg/services/iso-9001-2015-iso-14001-2015-iso-45001-2018-integrated-management-systems-introduction-training
75. Workplace Safety and Health Council (WSHC), accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc
76. StartSAFE, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.tal.sg/wshc/programmes/startsafe
77. WSH resources to support SMEs – Singapore – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/safe-measures/company-level/wsh-resources-to-support-smes
78. WSH Support Schemes – MOM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mom.gov.sg/workplace-safety-and-health/wsh-support-schemes
79. Singlife offers SME premium discount with WSH Council tie-up | Singapore Business Review, accessed July 25, 2025, https://sbr.com.sg/insurance/news/singlife-offers-sme-premium-discount-wsh-council-tie
80. Singlife offers SME premium discount with WSH Council tie-up | Insurance Asia, accessed July 25, 2025, https://insuranceasia.com/insurance/news/singlife-offers-sme-premium-discount-wsh-council-tie

Small Business Safety and Health Handbook – OSHA, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/small-business.pdf